Dead Patients Cost a Hospital $4 million Dollars Less Than A Doctor’s Bruised Ego

In Florida, the maximum amount of money a hospital has to pay the family of someone who died as a result of a doctor’s negligence is $1 million dollars.  Now read this:

The Supreme Court will not overturn a Florida surgeon’s $5 million slander award after a hospital executive said he would not send his dog to the doctor for surgery.

* * * *

Sadow and the hospital had been fighting in court because the doctor was denied privileges to do surgery in Lawnwood’s open-heart institute. A Lawnwood official then told another doctor about Sadow: “I would not send my dog to him for surgery.”

Source: Court will not overturn $5 million slander award

In other words, the hospital would have saved $4 million dollars if they had let this guy operate and he ended up negligently killing someone. 

Welcome to the wonderful world of tort “reform.”

Happy Meal Lawsuit Illustrates Why People Hate Lawyers, Democrats

When I was a kid, you know who decided what I ate for dinner?  My mom and dad.  My mom and dad took responsibility for raising me, and if they felt that it was in my best interest to say “no” to me, they did.  Today, there are some parents who aren’t willing to take that responsibility.  For proof, we need only look to a class action lawsuit filed because McDonald’s advertises that their Happy Meals come with toys:

“I am concerned about the health of my children and feel that McDonald?s should be a very limited part of their diet and their childhood experience,” said Parham, from Sacramento.

“But as other busy, working moms and dads know, we have to say ‘no’ to our young children so many times, and McDonald?s makes that so much harder to do.

“I object to the fact that McDonald?s is getting into my kids? heads without my permission and actually changing what my kids want to eat.”

Source: AFP: California mom sues McDonald’s over Happy Meals

This lawsuit is doomed to lose.  Doomed.  McDonald’s has a First Amendment right to say in their advertisements that their Happy Meals come with toys.  Such a claim is only deceptive if the Happy Meals do not in fact come with toys.  Unless McDonald’s is also telling children that eating Happy Meals is healthy for them, McDonald’s has done nothing wrong.

The bottom line is that this lawsuit is being used by a group of parents with a political agenda to try and change laws in a way that their state legislature won’t.  And lawsuits like this make people hate lawyers and Democrats.

Sure, I’m presuming this lawsuit was filed by Democratic parents.  I might be wrong, but I doubt it.  Democrats have been attacking fast food outlets for years, apparently hoping to make them change their menus.  The solution isn’t to sue McDonald’s, it’s to open your own competing chain that offers toys with decidedly healthy box meals.  (On a side note, I bet most kids would rather have a cheeseburger and fries with a ten-cent plastic toy than a bowl of broccoli with nicer toy.)

The lawyers behind this suit will also draw a lot of public criticism, and it will bleed over onto lawyers like me who believe that (a) parents shouldn’t kowtow to the demands of their children, and (b) restaurants have the right to serve unhealthy food.  In a worst case scenario, some enterprising legislator will use this as ammo to pass a lawsuit “reform” bill that will prevent legitimate lawsuits from going forward.

Shouldn’t we do this to domains that support terrorists before we go after music pirates?

What does it say about the power of lobbyists in this country that the government will seize domain names of web sites suspected of pirating music, but leaves terrorist-supporting web sites alone?

Following on the heels of this week’s domain seizure of a large hiphop file-sharing links forum, it’s clear today that the U.S. Government has been very busy. Without any need for COICA, ICE has just seized the domain of a BitTorrent meta-search engine along with those belonging to other music linking sites and several others which appear to be connected to physical counterfeit goods.

Source: U.S. Government Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and More | TorrentFreak

The Supreme Court recently upheld the constitutionality of a law that prohibits providing “material aid” to terrorists.  Publishing their rants has got to count as material aid.  So if we’re going to go around seizing domain names (which I don’t think we should) shouldn’t shutting down Al Qaeda’s web fronts be a higher priority than shutting down music pirates?  Just a thought.

A Great Example of Defense Lawyers Ripping Off Their Clients

How does this timeline strike you:

Morning: Judge holds hearing on motion, rules against Defendant, and signs order denying Defendant’s motion.

Afternoon: Defendant files copy of order granting motion that judge just denied that morning.

Since there was no motion for reconsideration or similar document filed along with the order, there was absolutely no reason whatsoever to draft and file that order.  So one of two things happened.  Either the defense lawyers got their wires crossed, or they deliberately did this just to bill the client for a half-an-hour of time.  Either way, if this time was billed, the client got ripped off. 

Remember, only defense lawyers have any financial incentive to delay litigation or file frivolous documents.  We on the plaintiffs’ side only get paid when we win, and we get paid a percentage, not by the hour.  So it’s against our financial interests to file motions we don’t believe in, or to try and delay litigation.

I Forgot My Seven-Year Blogging Anniversary

Apparently, I first started blogging on Halloween of 2003.  My goodness, that seems like forever ago.  I was working as a paralegal for a small personal injury law firm in Texas and I decided that someone needed to start telling the truth about the tort “reform” movement.  It looks like my very first blog post was about medical malpractice.  What a blast from the past:

58,000 people died in the ten years we were in Vietnam. 100,000 people die every year due to medical malpractice.

In West Virginia, just forty doctors cause 25% of the state’s malpractice claims.

Florida, Michigan, Texas, and West Virginia – all states with damage caps – have the highest malpractice insurance premium rates.

2/3rds of Medical Malpractice cases are dropped or dismissed with the plaintiff taking nothing.

Just .9 percent of malpractice plaintiffs are awarded money by a jury.

For the past ten years, the number of malpractice suits has remained steady.

Since 2000, the average malpractice jury award has gone down by 50%.

Source: Senator Hollings on Medical Malpractice – Justinian Lane – Commentary on law, politics, and tort "reform."

The next seven years will see more frequent blog posting, and a killer site redesign.  Seriously, I’m going to migrate to WordPress in a week or so, and my new site theme is just killer.  I’m also feeling reinvigorated about blogging now that so many of the big projects I’ve had are done.  (i.e. the bar exam, moving across the country, etc.) 

If you’ve got comments, suggestions, or questions, drop me a line.