I think the judge thought this lawsuit was frivolous
What do you think?
Riches v. Bonds, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97655
OPINION AND ORDER
This case is frivolous and deserves no further judicial time. See Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000), and Gladney v. Pendleton Correctional Facility, 302 F.3d 773, 774 (7th Cir. 2002) ("Sometimes, however, a suit is dismissed because the facts alleged in the complaint are so nutty ('delusional' is the polite word) that they're unbelievable, even though there has been no evidentiary hearing to determine their truth or falsity.")
For the foregoing reasons, this complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
ENTERED: August 16, 2007
/s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr.
United States District Court